As if everything revolved around Italy, after the earthquake that struck Japan, guess what you can speak again? Of nuclear energy. It 's good that the focus remains on high, given the high importance of the issue. The nuclear power is basically making radioactive half Fukishima Japan. Then you can discuss what you want, but this is the substance. There is no faction that takes, this is the core, it is appropriate to say, of the question. With nuclear energy that Italy would be made autonomous and should no longer depend on oil from France and North Africa is another irrefutable truth. But the point is: How long does it take to make operating the central Italian? I have heard even 20 years. In 20 years or so, maybe we will not be able to find an alternative source of energy? Or. Would not it be better to invest money and energy in research rather than on nuclear energy is, in fact, dangerous. Dangerous for Italy, for the neighbors, for children, for old, for the world! In the era of development sustainable a country that invests in nuclear power is a country in disarray. We are not Iran needs uranium to scare Israel and throughout the West. Then the issue of nuclear warheads would be speaking. Why should not we have the atomic bomb? The most powerful countries in the world have it. We do not? Why? For once we could, indeed should, be, or rather, of being groped a country edge. A country that decides to go against the trend, look to the future, starting to build now. If there is money for nuclear power plants there are also money for research. We must fight to prevent nuclear, there is no other choice. Certainly I can imagine to build power stations which turnover and lobbying magna magna or there may be under. Typical.
0 comments:
Post a Comment